Aaron Gulyas's Research, Teaching, and Writing
I’m spending this week in Eugene, Oregon at a NEH sponsored institute dedicated to Digital Humanities work within community colleges. What with one thing and another (writing books…) I’m a little out of the DH loop. Today (day 2) I learned about, and spent some time playing with, some potentially useful tools.
One of these is Voyant Tools, a web-based text analysis tool. Thinking to the manuscript I just sent on to McFarland on conspiracy narratives and conspiracy culture, I played around with loading different iterations of conspiracy theorist Bill Cooper’s MAJESTYTWELVE manifesto into it to analyze the differences. I entered three versions from Cooper’s website(s) and one from another site.
Cooper tended to update his manifesto as his research and interests broadened and, somewhat admirably, he never made any attempt to hide that. The additions over time help illustrate new directions into which his fears and crusades drifted throughout the late 1990s. Below is the output of the analysis:
[“NOTE! No idea who Bill Cooper is? Get yourself a copy of my short, inexpensive collection of essays The Chaos Conundrum,” Gulyas cheekily suggested…]
My mind is urgently turning over possible uses for this type of tool (and many others) in the introductory history classroom but I’m also thinking of its usefulness in analyzing the changeable and fluid nature of “fringe” parapolitical or paranormal/conspiratorial texts on the internet. It’s a bit of a commonplace that there are numerous versions of key documents floating around websites and–showing my age a bit, here–Usenet. The “Krill Report,” John Lear’s statements, Cooper’s prolific late 1980s output (which, interestingly, he would later imply was not entirely his, claiming that disinformation was being put out in his name), and the like appear in various places, often with variations of varying significance. Tools like Voyant could be used to plunge more deeply, in a textual sense, into the fringe cultures of the 1980s and 1990s.
Yes, this is the first blog entry in six months or so. I’ll do better, promise.
I need to come up with some sort of rationalized system for regular posting here, I think…
The semester is almost over and, ahead of the deadline, I got the manuscript of my conspiracy/paranoia television book into the series editor’s hands. I now await feedback and catch up on everything else!
There are now a number of television shows I don’t want to see for a very long time, including Dark Skies, Harsh Realm, and anything else having to do with virtual reality. I will say, however, that I have a new appreciation for Wild Palms–really interesting stuff that made no sense when I saw it on broadcast back in the early 1990s.
With this one out of the way, I can get stuck into the new conspiracy/history book for McFarland as well as polishing off a chapter for another television themed collection. Then I’m going to sleep for a long time.
Well, I’ve been writing. A lot. Sometimes I change it up by using computers that are older than some of my students.
SLINGSHOT has been off to its editors, and has come back with relatively few changes needed, which is always a good feeling. I should have that completely off of my hands within a few days. SLINGSHOT is a chapter in a collection of essays on time travel in television science fiction and it has been great fun to work on.
EIGHTH WRENCH is nearing completion.
BLACK SCREWDRIVER is humming along and should be to the people who need it in plenty of time to keep everyone from being worried about deadlines. It seems to have benefited from its relatively long gestation period in the form of research and extensive outlining/planning. The writing itself is going pretty smoothly. I do have to talk to my editor about some structural changes I think would make it stronger.
CROSSROAD, the vaguely conspiracy shaped thing is in full-on research and material gathering mode.
There are some other little things hanging out, but they’re tiny. The one remaining not-tiny job is the final report for my sabbatical project.
As part of the research and background for both BLACK SCREWDRIVER and CROSSROAD, I’ve been refreshing myself on the satanic panic of the 1980s and early 1990s which I slightly remember from the time. The Geraldo prime-time special was its own kind of fun and I’m currently reading Lucifer Dethroned by Bill Schnoebelen. Like Mike Warnke, Schnoebelen claimed to have been deeply involved in a massive Satanic occult conspiracy but then found Christianity. I know that Warnke (who I remember hearing on Christian radio as a kid) was outed pretty thoroughly as a fraud but I’ve not looked deeply into Schnoebelan’s story yet.
Schnoebelen’s book, being published by the Chick Tracts folks, is steeped in anti-Catholocism as well as DevilFear.
The Satanic Ritual Abuse stuff from a few decades back dovetails very nicely with a number of other conspiracy theories and, while I wasn’t planning on addressing it, the topic has started to surface in unexpected places. I’m now stuck, it seems.
On a side note, I was able to attend a writers’ workshop at my school for a day a few weeks ago. I’d have been there for the whole week if strep throat hadn’t waylaid me. It was strange talking to people who write fiction and poetry. It seems very difficult. Although, since history sometimes fails to make sense, it’s tempting to plaster over the discontinuities and poorly-documented events with made up stuff. Of course, then I’d just be the History Channel, wouldn’t I?
In my position as a faculty tech consultant for our College’s Center for Teaching and Learning, I write an occasional email for colleagues on technology and teaching issues. This is a bit from this week’s missive about writing apps and tools (edited and expanded from what went to my hapless colleagues who received it, unbidden, this morning).
Work is progressing on both BLACK SCREWDRIVER and SLINGSHOT (which needs to be done in the next couple weeks). I’m traveling a bit over the next few weeks, in between teaching work and on-campus obligations so I’m not sure when the writing’s going to get done. When I should be sleeping, is what I suspect.
As is nearly visible in the picture above, I’ve been writing in longhand again, filling up notebooks with illegible scrawl.
My interview with Greg Bishop of Radio Misterioso is available for download here—it was loads of fun; give it a listen.
Writer Warren Ellis is doing a daily morning writing thing at morning.computer and it is making me think that writing every day about stuff that isn’t for a particular project is a good idea. Then I realize that this writing thing is hard enough for me without creating more to do!
I should get back to work now.
Two recent reviews of Extraterrestrials and the American Zeitgeist have recently emerged and they are, on the whole, positive.
The first, by poet and author Eric Hoffman is at openminds.tv, a good general-purpose UFO news site and (increasingly rarely, these days) newsstand magazine. Hoffman, like many reviewers has thankfully picked up on the point that the book aimed to be a scholarly examination rather than an expose (on the one hand) or Contactee apologetics text (on the other):
Refreshingly, Gulyas’ Extraterrestrials and the American Zeitgeist makes no claims to the truth of the contactee experience, yet instead offers a readable, jargon-free, well-researched and insightful analysis of the contactee’s cultural impact and continued relevance, charting its various manifestations intelligibly and authoritatively. It is a welcome addition to a handful of books offering a penetrative and balanced exploration of the psychological and sociological importance of the UFO phenomenon.
The second is in Nova Religio, a scholarly journal which covers “new and emerging religions.” Unfortunately, it’s behind a paywall on JStor and I actually found it by accident (although my publisher, McFarland, notified me of it a day later!) and when I saw that it was written by Robert S. Ellwood, I eagerly payed the $12 to buy the review. Ellwood is one of America’s leading scholars of emerging religious movements, and has written extensively on the Contactees. When I recalled that I quoted him in my chapter on George Adamski, I frankly panicked. I mean, this guy is a big deal!
Overall, Ellwood’s review was positive, although he (correctly, as I noted to him in an email) pointed out that I really should have discussed Jung’s work on Flying Saucers and leaving out Orfeo Angelucci and Daniel Fry was probably a mistake in my discussion of the 1950s guys. Some deeper discussion of the influence of science fiction was also called for but he seemed to like it and didn’t take issue with my argument on the significance and impact of the Contactees:
Gulyas properly makes the point that, however unsophisticated these envoys of the ‘‘space brothers’’ may have been, in those days of Cold War and political paranoia, their persistent declarations that the cosmic callers were urging humanity toward a higher level of peace, tolerance, and living by what Adamski called Cosmic Law, deserved to be heard.
the way this book brought back such memories of other long-ago saucerians is a tribute to its evocative historical prose, and Gulyas certainly portrays sufficient of them to establish the type and highlight the anti-nuclear, peace and egalitarian doctrines these benign aliens were concerned we earthlings must adopt before we destroy ourselves.
I am over the moon about any praise from a scholar on Ellwood’s level and I am deeply grateful that Eric Hoffman took so much time and care with his review.
From Cambridge’s Department of Geography’s page on Ghost Species: Geographies of Absence and Extinction:
This project explores the idea that there is a spectre haunting conservation policies in the twenty-first century: the spectre of absence. Drawing on the recent ‘spectral turn’ in the humanities and social sciences, this project brings something new to debates about extinction, de-extinction, and restoration. When viewed through the lens of spectral geography, absence is not a lack of something – the opposite of presence. Rather, absence is powerful – it reverberates through landscapes and memories (‘gone but not forgotten’) and disturbs the ‘when’ of spatiotemporal experience and the ‘how’ of perception. This animation of absence has implications for conservation policy in two distinct ways.
Since I’m not exactly plugged into cutting edge research I was not particularly aware there was a “spectral turn” taking place in the humanities and social sciences, but I’m not surprised. Looking around for more, I found a number of recent scholarly journal articles (most behind paywalls) about hauntological subjects—the atemporality that I discuss in The Chaos Conundrum and that others have seen at work on the fringiest of popular culture.
At the very least, this Ghost Species project looks fascinating. The next decade or so should see some exciting scholarly works.
These were stuck in a bag in my car didn’t make it into yesterday’s post!
Watkins book on ley lines along with Kirk and Lang on what we might call folk tales and general fey-ness are crucial for understanding some of the cultural underpinnings of these phenomena.
Keep in mind I’m not saying these will reveal the answers to everything or that everything in them is necessarily true. However they have informed a lot of thinking about these subjects over the years.
They’re available from a variety of sources online, as I believe they’re both in the public domain.
Digging through the bookshelf this morning, I decided to think a bit about what books I would recommend as a starting point for those who wanted to dig more deeply into paranormal topics. Consider the following list a work in progress. Some of these are no longer in print and really hard to find although sometimes you can get them fairly inexpensively on Half or the like.