Writing Tools and Technology

In my position as a faculty tech consultant for our College’s Center for Teaching and Learning, I write an occasional email for colleagues on technology and teaching issues. This is a bit from this week’s missive about writing apps and tools (edited and expanded from what went to my hapless colleagues who received it, unbidden, this morning). 

Writing, often, involves technology. Now, when I’ve written stuff, the people I send it to want it in Microsoft Word format. This, often, involves me having to use MS Word. There are, however, other apps I use for writing that allow me to organize ideas, citations, images, and snippets of quickly conceived draft text.
 
Yes, I’m going to say Evernote. Honestly, I’m not getting money from them (opposite, in fact). Every digital thing I need to store somewhere goes into Evernote.
 
Do you engage in mind mapping? I usually don’t. But there are times when mind mapping and visual diagrams are the only way to make something make sense before I put pen to paper. Scapple is a great, easy to use app for Windows and Mac that makes mind mapping easy.
 
I would be (and have been) lost without Dropbox for making sure whatever I need is there whenever I need it; including and especially the actually MS Word files I write in and will send to whoever I’m sending stuff.
 
An iPad (or other largeish tablet) with some sort of physical keyboard makes a good writing tool when a laptop is impractical. I use a Zagg/Logitech keyboard case for my unfortunately sausage-like fingers and usually simply type straight into Evernote and copy the text into the master document at a later time. There are reasons I do it this way, but they are even more boring than the rest of this email.
 
Finally, there is the tech that rarely fails–pen and paper. I use Sharpie Fine Point pens, Field Notes pocket sized notebooks and larger Moleskines. While I obviously spend stupid amounts of money on paper it’s cheaper and healthier than many habits I could have.
 
The most important thing to remember about writing and technology is, as Warren Ellis has wisely pointed out, that there is no fancy pen, pricey hipster notebook, magic application or nifty gadget that will make you write better. The best way to improve your writing is to write more.
 
As a side note, Ellis’s writing about writing process (as in the link above) is one of those things that made me think about my writing more. He writes comics and novels and screenplays so it’s a different sort of thing from what I do but until I read some of his thoughts about it, I never thought to think about it, if that makes sense.
 
More travel this weekend, but writing on SLINGSHOT is nearing completion (which is good, because the deadline is nearing as well!) and as for BLACK SCREWDRIVER, I just finished the chapter that had been giving me fits for about two months now. I feel like I’m over the hump on that one (yes, I probably just jinxed myself). EIGHTH WRENCH is just about fully formed in my brain and in detailed outline form and will just need to be gotten down on paper (“just”?).
 
The new project, CROSSROAD, is the one that will need the mind mapping software or, at least, some sort of flowcharting. It’s slightly terrifying.

On and Off the Road

Photo on 6 27 14 at 9 08 PM

Work is progressing on both BLACK SCREWDRIVER and SLINGSHOT (which needs to be done in the next couple weeks). I’m traveling a bit over the next few weeks, in between teaching work and on-campus obligations so I’m not sure when the writing’s going to get done. When I should be sleeping, is what I suspect.

As is nearly visible in the picture above, I’ve been writing in longhand again, filling up notebooks with illegible scrawl.

My interview with Greg Bishop of Radio Misterioso is available for download here—it was loads of fun; give it a listen.

Writer Warren Ellis is doing a daily morning writing thing at morning.computer and it is making me think that writing every day about stuff that isn’t for a particular project is a good idea. Then I realize that this writing thing is hard enough for me without creating more to do!

I should get back to work now.

Some Recent Reviews

Two recent reviews of Extraterrestrials and the American Zeitgeist have recently emerged and they are, on the whole, positive.

The first, by poet and author Eric Hoffman is at openminds.tv, a good general-purpose UFO news site and (increasingly rarely, these days) newsstand magazine. Hoffman, like many reviewers has thankfully picked up on the point that the book aimed to be a scholarly examination rather than an expose (on the one hand) or Contactee apologetics text (on the other):

Refreshingly, Gulyas’ Extraterrestrials and the American Zeitgeist makes no claims to the truth of the contactee experience, yet instead offers a readable, jargon-free, well-researched and insightful analysis of the contactee’s cultural impact and continued relevance, charting its various manifestations intelligibly and authoritatively. It is a welcome addition to a handful of books offering a penetrative and balanced exploration of the psychological and sociological importance of the UFO phenomenon.

The second is in Nova Religio, a scholarly journal which covers “new and emerging religions.” Unfortunately, it’s behind a paywall on JStor and I actually found it by accident (although my publisher, McFarland, notified me of it a day later!) and when I saw that it was written by Robert S. Ellwood, I eagerly payed the $12 to buy the review. Ellwood is one of America’s leading scholars of emerging religious movements, and has written extensively on the Contactees. When I recalled that I quoted him in my chapter on George Adamski, I frankly panicked. I mean, this guy is a big deal!

Overall, Ellwood’s review was positive, although he (correctly, as I noted to him in an email) pointed out that I really should have discussed Jung’s work on Flying Saucers and leaving out Orfeo Angelucci and Daniel Fry was probably a mistake in my discussion of the 1950s guys. Some deeper discussion of the influence of science fiction was also called for but he seemed to like it and didn’t take issue with my argument on the significance and impact of the Contactees:

Gulyas properly makes the point that, however unsophisticated these envoys of the ‘‘space brothers’’ may have been, in those days of Cold War and political paranoia, their persistent declarations that the cosmic callers were urging humanity toward a higher level of peace, tolerance, and living by what Adamski called Cosmic Law, deserved to be heard.

And:

the way this book brought back such memories of other long-ago saucerians is a tribute to its evocative historical prose, and Gulyas certainly portrays sufficient of them to establish the type and highlight the anti-nuclear, peace and egalitarian doctrines these benign aliens were concerned we earthlings must adopt before we destroy ourselves.

I am over the moon about any praise from a scholar on Ellwood’s level and I am deeply grateful that Eric Hoffman took so much time and care with his review.

A “Spectral Turn”?

From Cambridge’s Department of Geography’s page on Ghost Species: Geographies of Absence and Extinction:

This project explores the idea that there is a spectre haunting conservation policies in the twenty-first century: the spectre of absence. Drawing on the recent ‘spectral turn’ in the humanities and social sciences, this project brings something new to debates about extinction, de-extinction, and restoration. When viewed through the lens of spectral geography, absence is not a lack of something – the opposite of presence. Rather, absence is powerful – it reverberates through landscapes and memories (‘gone but not forgotten’) and disturbs the ‘when’ of spatiotemporal experience and the ‘how’ of perception. This animation of absence has implications for conservation policy in two distinct ways.

Since I’m not exactly plugged into cutting edge research I was not particularly aware there was a “spectral turn” taking place in the humanities and social sciences, but I’m not surprised. Looking around for more, I found a number of recent scholarly journal articles (most behind paywalls) about hauntological subjects—the atemporality that I discuss in The Chaos Conundrum and that others have seen at work on the fringiest of popular culture.

At the very least, this Ghost Species project looks fascinating. The next decade or so should see some exciting scholarly works.

Two more for the recommended pile

20140529-095641-35801786.jpg

These were stuck in a bag in my car didn’t make it into yesterday’s post!

Watkins book on ley lines along with Kirk and Lang on what we might call folk tales and general fey-ness are crucial for understanding some of the cultural underpinnings of these phenomena.

Keep in mind I’m not saying these will reveal the answers to everything or that everything in them is necessarily true. However they have informed a lot of thinking about these subjects over the years.

They’re available from a variety of sources online, as I believe they’re both in the public domain.

Recommended Reading

20140527-102512-37512537.jpg

Digging through the bookshelf this morning, I decided to think a bit about what books I would recommend as a starting point for those who wanted to dig more deeply into paranormal topics. Consider the following list a work in progress. Some of these are no longer in print and really hard to find although sometimes you can get them fairly inexpensively on Half or the like.

Continue reading

Down One of Many Rabbit Holes…

Just got done doing a very fun interview with Greg Bishop of Radio Misterioso. Unfortunately, the live stream at killradio was malfunctioning so it’s unclear how many—if any!—people heard it. Greg should have the downloadable version up sooner rather than later.

Along with talking about The Chaos Conundrum and Extraterrestrials and the American Zeitgeist we discussed the nature of the paranormal, the hassles of writing (and the hassles of getting people to publish said writing), and thousands of other topics.

One thing, which i brought up when I was briefly on the other week was the Boxcar Willie as Lizard Person meme. It’s out there, in various places. Here is an un-retouched shot of a Google search I just undertook:

2014 05 26 01 45 30

So the idea is out there. One of the search results is a good interview of David Icke in the Guardian by Jon Ronson, author of The Men Who Stare at Goats, Them, and others. Ronson writes

Indeed, every individual accused of reptilian paedophilia by David Icke had so far failed to sue, including Bob Hope, George Bush, George Bush Jr, Ted Heath, the Rothschild family, Boxcar Willie, the Queen of England, the Queen Mother, Prince Philip, Kris Kristofferson, Al Gore and the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group.  

This was from early 2001, so the Boxcar-Willie-as-LIzard-person notion has been around for a while. On RM, with Greg, I posited that it emerged as a conflation of Icke’s reptilian stuff with the mind control/pedophilia/cocaine/country music industry conspiracy promoted by Cathy O’Brien in Trance-Formation of America, a troubling and strange book. 

While tracking down the origins of the various slanders against BCW is just plain fun, it also is part of a new project I’m working on (that will be finished sometime in 2015). Speaking of work, here’s some word-accountability: